This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Hersh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 May 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article issues.
editThis article is basically a resume reliant almost entirely on primary sources and a not-too-subtle advertisement for the subject's private medical practice. [1]. The few non-primary "references" do not mention the subject or mention him only in passing. At this point, I'm not sure this even passes the notability criteria for academics. In my view each reference needs to be checked for its validity, broken links, and/or whether it attests to the subject's notability. If there is not significant improvement in the sourcing for this article, it may well end up at an Articles for deletion discussion. If the article's principal author has any affiliation whatsoever, either personal or professional, with Peter Hersh, I strongly suggest they read WP:COI and follow the guidance there scrupulously, Voceditenore (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)