Talk:Peter Kjær (architect)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Anthony Appleyard in topic Requested move
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Peter Kjaer (architect) → Peter Kjær (architect) — This is the correct spelling of this Danish architect's name. Favonian (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment what's the common form used in English sources? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- When I started this article I wasn't sure about how to do the æ letter, so I just took the easy way out, but I support the move. That will correspond to the the Swedish article: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kjær Mickeno 14:00, 1 Match 2010 (CET)
- There aren't that many English sources, and they are "conflicted" on this issue. The official (English language) press release about the school of architecture and Kjær's position spells it with an "æ". Incidentally, the article about his namesake, Peter Kjær the goal keeper, uses the Danish spelling. Yes, I know that's not a permissible argument, but I use it anyway ;) Favonian (talk) 21:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- I am in favor of the move. We have all the technical means to spell the name correctly. --Mk4711 (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.