Talk:Peter Sinfield

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Herbal; remedies

edit

I object to the assertion that: "has used various natural remedies to cure his own and others' health complaints"

There is no citation for this, let alone any medical or scientific evidence. Maybe he claimed something, maybe someone else claimed something, but without evidence, this should be taken out.


Still....

edit

This album featured prominently in an article by Danny Baker in Q Magazine in autumn 1992 on the subject of the Worst Albums Ever Made; more specifically, albums that you buy and shove into a cupboard after playing them once because they're so embarrassingly terrible (and terribly embarrassing).

I remember Sinfield and band playing two tracks from this album on the Old Grey Whistle Test so, as a purchaser of the said LP, I wasn't the only one taken in! (But it was dreadful.) Thegn 21:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Best known for?

edit

Best known for "I Believe In Father Christmas"???? Celine Dion's "Think Twice" was a UK 7 week NO.1, the 45th biggest selling song in UK music history and reached NO.1 in countries all over the world. It sold in the region of 9 million. Slightly bigger hit don't you think?! --Tuzapicabit (talk) 00:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Hmmm. In the UK the Greg Lake track is wheeled out by radio stations (and indeed in shops) every December without fail. If you add together the radio play it's had here asa against the Celine track, which doesn't particularly have any kind of lasting reputation in itself despite its popularity at the time, "Father Christmas" wins hands down. It's a song familiar to generations of people - which can't really be said of any of Dion's records, except maybe the Titanic song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.83.118 (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Sinfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Sinfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Peter Sinfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply