Talk:Peter Truscott, Baron Truscott

Censorship of factual information.

Six other (non-labour) peers refused to cooperate with the undercover reporters.

I am trying to add the above to the first paragraph. It is extremely relevant and salient to the context of the corruption allegations which bear heavily on the calibre of all recently ennobled labour peers. However it keeps being reverted without justification. 86.168.251.246 (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

There is a main article for this subject Cash for Influence. Please the material there together with a proper reference to the original source leaky_caldron (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Please do not vandalise that article (or any other) in the way you have with this one. Thanks

I'll stop 'vandalising' when you stop censoring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.251.246 (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

What the hell are you playing at? I am quoting factual information from the original newspaper article which has alreadybeen cited as a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.251.246 (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Started off by getting rid of your intentional and undeniable vandalism - not a good start to your editing career. I can find no reference in The TimesOnline article to 6 other Lords being approached. Please tell me where this is and I will happily put it into the main article leaky_caldron (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

The article is at [1] and says that the six peers includes three conservatives, one unionist, one liberal democrat and one labour, who we also know to be Lord Harris [2] Jengaman80 (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and also for picking up the reinstated vandalism! leaky_caldron (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Peter Truscott, Baron Truscott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090205125616/http://www.berr.gov.uk:80/aboutus/ministerial-team/page35409.html to http://www.berr.gov.uk/aboutus/ministerial-team/page35409.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090205125648/http://www.berr.gov.uk:80/aboutus/ministerial-team/Speeches/page39320.html to http://www.berr.gov.uk/aboutus/ministerial-team/Speeches/page39320.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)