Talk:Petrolisthes armatus
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Piledhigheranddeeper in topic Photo
 | A fact from Petrolisthes armatus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Weasel words
edit"It has" not been generally suggested that the species is a species complex. The article quoted names a couple of papers that suggested this, then delves into the question. Please don't weasel, state who questioned what in each instance, without making me template every weasel instance. -205.170.118.162 (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have rephrased the sentence as "several authors". If you wish to expand on this and state the names of the authors involved, you are welcome to do so. The template you added is not appropriate because I have added a citation at the end of the sentence and the introduction to the paper uses the term "several authors" without naming them. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- "Several authors" in quotes with a proper citation should be okay for a non-scholastic work. The template was appropriate when added, as it says exactly what I meant. --205.170.118.162 (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Photo
editThis article needs some photos of its subject. Anybody? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)