Talk:Peyronie's disease

Reads like an advert

This article reeks of the worst kind of advertising: adverts for "male enhancement". I am speaking mostly about the section on treatments. Lines like "Due to the very intrusive nature of penile curvature correction surgery, and the arguably scarce [sic] results that it provides[...]" Clearly break WP:NPOV and WP:NOADS. In fact, excluding citation 23, citations 20-24 are taken directly from websites that sell these types of devices. I'll try to do some cleanup, but bare in mind I am a new user. Lebowbowbowski (talk) 02:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Your work got reverted maybe? I went back in and cleaned it up. The sources have made it to publication but links to those studies need paid accounts to see them so the one link is still connected to their sales site. I made it clear that no complete reversals of the condition is possible and usually minor curvature improvements are effected. The sources were misquoted and I corrected this and I removed the unsourced attacks against surgery. Surgery can cause shortening but one of the techniques I saw in the source has postop patients using vacuum devices to gently stretch and avoid this. This page needs watching for the extender sales people are trying to pad it. 97.85.168.22 (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Peyronie's disease shown in flaccid penis.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Peyronie's disease shown in flaccid penis.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Verapamil

The article states that calcium channel blockers can cause this disease; it also states that Verapamil is a possible treatment. Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker. Can someone please explain how/why a drug that causes the disease would also be used to treat it? This is very confusing. Thank you. 64.185.130.216 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Intralesional verapamil is alleged to work and there is a paper out on this. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429597007000 They have gotten small effects in small groups. There is no medical consensus that it works...as many trials of verapamil have failed and led to no published papers. On SITE the drug acts differently than taken orally. Here's what they say "Calcium channel blockers have been shown in vitro and in vivo to inhibit secretion and synthesis of extracellular matrix, including collagen, glycosaminoglycans, and fibronectin, as well as causing increased collagenase and anti transforming growth factor-beta activity. Calcium antagonists, including verapamil, are effective in stimulating the remodeling and degradation of extracellular matrix in tissue by altering the metabolic pathways of fibroblasts. Recently, a pilot study (1994) showed preliminary promising results in treating plaque caused by Peyronie’s disease. This randomized single-blind placebo-based study (1994 to 1996) was undertaken to confirm the hypothesis." Angelatomato (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peyronie's disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522131140/http://peyronies.webs.com/ to http://peyronies.webs.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

please add link to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Peyronie%27s_disease

please add link to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Peyronie%27s_disease 2A02:8071:8C1:6000:F03B:951F:166D:1D58 (talk) 18:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)