Talk:Pho
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pho article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
"Xe lua" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Xe lua has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 6 § Xe lua until a consensus is reached. asilvering (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
An opinion to improve this article
editFor the content of the article, I think the structure is well-organized and attractive to readers. The first section is History, which recaps of how the history and cultural events impact to the invention of Pho. The room for the improvement of this section is finding more researchers' works on the origin of Pho because the article only mentioned Trinh Quang Dung contribution on the path of finding Pho's origin. So, this is a lack in the reliability and diversity of sources in my opinion.
However, about the sources, there are several sources are dead and cannot be accessed due to outdated link or technical difficulties, so I can guess that the author hasn't improved this article for a long, long time. For example, [13] , [14], and [36] cannot be found and the link led to an error.