Talk:Phantasmagoria (disambiguation)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Jerm in topic Requested move 4 October 2019
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
editI guess all other uses are derived from the old poem, maybe this should be investigated...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.211.132.72 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 4 October 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 02:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
– No primarytopic – WP:NOTDICT. Dicklyon (talk) 03:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. JHunterJ (talk) 17:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- Pageviews. The August 2018 spike for Phantasmagoria (video game) is from being the featured article of the day. Not sure about the smaller spike 2 months later on Phantasmagoria. I don't see how WP:NOTDICT is relevant to this case. Phantasmagoria seems to me like a legitimate encyclopedic topic, not just a word. Colin M (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a legit topic. I just meant that being the definition of the word doesn't make it primarytopic. Dicklyon (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Every later use of the word "Phantasmagoria", mainly as a title, seems to have been inspired by the original horror theatre shows. Usually such a title seems to be chosen as an obvious reference to that type of show. Therefore I think it makes more sense to keep it as it is. Joortje1 (talk) 11:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- That's not among the criteria at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It's clearly not even close to half the page views, so disambiguation seems a better choice. Dicklyon (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Primary topic by longterm significance.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. All others seem derivative. Disambiguation pages should be suffixed with "(disambiguation)" to indicate what they are. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.