Talk:Pharmacological torture
Latest comment: 2 months ago by 98.46.111.225 in topic Clinically insane preamble writer
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pharmacological torture article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Pharmacological torture.
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clinically insane preamble writer
editI think an institutionalized paranoid schizophrenic has been checking this wiki page every other day for the last 10 months to make sure their horribly written paragraph stays up 2600:1009:B128:C11C:54C6:B7C3:C980:F9CD (talk) 02:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's an awfully strong diagnosis from a seemingly well constructed logical argument. What's incorrect about it? Are you some medical/pharmacy damage control? That seems far more likely from the posting and your entirely over the top and far reaching conclusions. 2601:242:C202:1090:298A:F443:81C7:8F4 (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Moreover, from an ethical perspective, if this page is actually frequently visited by someone struggling with mental health conditions and psychiatric pain, the OP's comment just invalidated them, made their conditions worse, and might potentially cause them their life.
- A much better approach would be to develop this page further, with substantive research and evidence, in order to validate the person in question, and later perhaps in this page offer help, ranging from online conversations and dialectics, to friendly and humanitarian legal resources to restore their autonomy and freedom, and, if they consent to such, psychiatric care of higher standard, one with actual respect to their autonomy.
- So to the person in question should you exist: we see you, we hear you, your pains are valid, the persecution you perceive is true, and there is always hope for you; and to the OP: shut up.
- PS. And just so you know... I don't know if these atrocious practices have ceased in EU and America, but I can definitely tell you, being fueled by various social and political motives, it hasn't in China (e.g. Yang Yongxin), and me and my fellow dissident activists constantly face such atrocities.
- --Fourier-Deligne Transgirl (talk) 00:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- It’s informative and to the point and for that I applaud the writer.
- So damage control it is!
- How many times have you visited this page? Maybe you should seek more help. 98.46.111.225 (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
TODO: Alleged use - China
editThe subject is self-explanatory. Fourier-Deligne Transgirl (talk) 23:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)