Talk:Phase One Media Pro

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Udo Schmitz in topic Software is discontinued
edit

Website www.phaseone.com/media-pro Goes to a non-existent page. Since I do not know the correct link, I did not want to edit/correct it myself. Seattle Rex (talk) 19:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Biased

edit

This seems quite biased in the initial section. I know this is a stub, but should it be marked as non-neutral also? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.51.104 (talk) 03:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Phase One Media ProMedia Pro – The article name is misleading, as the product name is only Media Pro. Other Phase One product articles such as Capture One is not named in this way. Mikkelhansen123 (talk) 15:03, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oppose "Media Pro" is too generic a name. And besides, who says the article name should only and only contain the product name? Fleet Command (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, that's actually a pretty good argument. I got the idea to change the name from looking at the Aperture (software) page. It's not called Apple Aperture - and i would argue that Aperture is even more generic than Media Pro. Media pro (software) could be a compromise then. (I apologize for all the editing!) Mikkelhansen123 (talk) 10:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
No. First, I do not discuss "what about article X?" kind of discussion. If you wish to register an objection to that article's name, discuss in its own talk page. Second, unlike what you said earlier, "Phase One Media Pro" is a trademarked name (see product homepage and its entry in U.S. Trademark website). That means it is the actual official name and toying with it is something the U.S. laws (which applies to Wikipedia) frowns upon. Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not enough history

edit

This started as a shareware Mac (OS9) gallery app called just 'iView' and went though multiple major versions and name changes before the history section starts. There should be plenty of RS (old MacWorld reviews etc.) to expand the history section considerably. eg http://www.steves-digicams.com/news/iview-multimedia-36-for-the-mac.html#b http://www.macworld.com/article/1021710/iview.html

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Phase One Media Pro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phase One Media Pro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Software is discontinued

edit

Source: http://mikepasini.com/corners/2018/09/05-media-pro-discontinued.htm

Official notice: https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/Software/Capture-One-Pro/mediapro-discontinue.aspx --Udo Schmitz (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC) --Udo Schmitz (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply