Talk:Phases and Stages/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by GreatOrangePumpkin in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Does she really "deserted" him or just "left" him? But overall the prose is pretty good; MOS too.
corrected (deserted--->left).--GDuwenTell me! 17:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Please use {{sfn}} template; Replace AllRovi with Rovi Corporation
Done.--GDuwenTell me! 17:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: