Talk:Phil Tufnell

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

According to Cricinfo, Tufnell scored 153 runs in Test Cricket, not 453. This is more in line with his Test Average. I have amended this detail. Rrsmac 12:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Annoying

edit

Surely Tufnell's highly irritating "cheeky chappie" persona should have been made mention of, and that bizarre laugh of his. I doubt it is just Ricky Ponting and the Australian cricket team who find this man intensely annoying. Guv2006 19:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

-Or maybe Ricky Ponting should develop a sense of humour. The guy is a class batsman but far from a class person. The English have had it stuck down our throats for years by the Aussies so don't get all righteous on us now because you're getting some back. UncleTheOne

Tufnell was charged by the police with assault on a girlfriend.[ http://www.thesportshq.com/articles/Cricket-equipment%5CFamous-players%5CCricket-equipment-Famous-Players-Phil-Tufnell.html] His first wife left him and became a prostitute. Why is there no mention of the fact he beat up a girlfriend. Why? What is cheeky about that.

Personal life controversy

edit

I have removed a chunk of uncited material because it's potentially libellous. It was about allegations of assault in 1994. If someone can cite it feel free to add it back in. The version that contained it was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phil_Tufnell&oldid=374813713. Tomcrocker (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This article looks reliable. Axl ¤ [Talk] 22:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wife

edit

Dawn who? 31.52.255.151 (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phil Tufnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phil Tufnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply