Talk:Philadelphia Toboggan Coasters
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philadelphia Toboggan Coasters article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Philadelphia Toboggan Company logo.jpg
edit
Image:Philadelphia Toboggan Company logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I really hate this fair-use rationale crap -- it really detracts from *real* work on the encyclopedia. But to appease the gods of Wikipedia, I placed a rationale on the image. You'd think a general rationale could be made for all logos that are placed on their company's own article... --Rehcsif (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Shoreline Village PTC carousel
editWhen was this PTC carousel at Shoreline Village in Long Beach, California? It looks like the Santa Monica Pier to me. 173.67.106.134 (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Coasters at Canada's Wonderland
editPlease do not add Mighty Canadian Minebuster and Wildebeast. These coasters were not built by PTC despite plaques at the operator's booth and several published reports that claim they were. PTC stopped building coasters in 1979. This was determined by several well-known PTC researchers, and has been published in both RollerCoaster! magazine and First Drop.—JlACEer (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)