 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
editIm very confused at this stage, this is the 2nd time i have tried to put a page about Philip Clemo together. The 1st page was deemed as advertising and deleted and there was an issue raised about the copyright of some of the text however i checked with Philip Clemo himself and it was infact the website your referenced that had copied the text in question.
I discussed the deletion of the page with Philip and we worked on putting something more specific and factual together in the hope it would not be considered advertising of any kind.
If there is still an issue with the suitability of the page or its content can someone please explain to me what it is that is not acceptable, from my point of view the page is purely factual and serves to inform people about Philip as an individual and an artist aswell as providing information about his work but all input would be appreciated. Im happy to put the work in to make the page suitable but its very frustrating to see my work simply deleted.
Pclemo (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- You may want to read about Conflict of Interest, as well as copyright and sources. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 04:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)