Talk:Philip Howard, 13th Earl of Arundel

An anomaly

edit

Howard is reported as having died in the Tower of dysentery, yet his place of death is "Tower Hill". This is only possible if he was executed, which the article contradicts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smlark (talkcontribs) 16:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

While charges of treason were never proved: What proof do you expect?

A trial by his peers would differ from a bill of attainder precisely in that the latter had to also pass the House of Commons.

A foure-fould meditation

edit

Apparently Howard is credited with writing A foure-fould meditation, which appeared in 1606 credited to Robert Southwell. Is there evidence that would favor Howard over Southwell? Fotoguzzi (talk) 15:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philip Howard, 20th Earl of Arundel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Treason and proof

edit

A version of this article as of October 2018 said "While charges of high treason were never proven...". However, the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition states "[h]e was tried for high treason on the 14th of April 1589, found guilty...". It's possible that those two statements are consistent if the charge was brought without proof; this was presumably the Star Chamber after all. But I think as the prior statement has no clear sourcing it's best to leave the contradiction out unless it can be explained. David Brooks (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply