Talk:Philipp Stamma

date of match with Philidor

Here is mentioned 1745 but in Philidor is mentioned 1747. Does someone know which is correct? --YoavD (talk) 06:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

"Larousse du Jeu d'Échecs", which I consider a very reliable publication, gives 1747 as the correct year. Too bad these games were never recorded for posterity... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.208.146.141 (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

photo

I don't think the photo of the book should be in the info box. Bubba73 ^{(Who's attacking me now?)}, 19:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Why not? Luis Ramírez de Lucena. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Because the article is about the person, not the book. The photo of the book can go in the body of the article. That is not a photo of Stamma. Lucena should be fixed too. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 01:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Philidor - Stamma match result controversy

Concerning Bledow and von Oppen comment "I formerly thought that Stamma never played with Philidor this match... the event is reported only by Philidor's biographers, who differ and contradict one another in indicating the conditions of the match, and one could also have some doubts about the result in the way it is reported..."

I found everywhere the match result reported as +8 =1 -1 (or +8 -2 considering the match rules) in Philidor favour. Bledow and von Oppen suggest that there are other versions however. I remember years ago, I read somewhere that the match results was +8 -2 or +8 -4 according to the sources. Doas anybody knows something more about it? Sersunzo (talk) 03:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philipp Stamma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000312033648/http://www.excaliburelectronics.com/history0799.html to http://www.excaliburelectronics.com/history0799.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)