Talk:Phish: Live in Brooklyn (video)

Vote

Don't do it. I was dissappointed when I was redirected to the Album when I had set my sights on reading about the DVD. TommyBoy76 23:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Weak Oppose. I think it makes sense to have different articles for different media, but some of the information at what is currently the CD article (Phish: Live in Brooklyn) should be moved to the DVD article (Phish: Live in Brooklyn (DVD)). For example, the section on "Bonus material" applies to the DVDs, not the CD set (side note: included bonus footage from 6/18/06 is not mentioned). Also, the (separate) "Bonus disc" is no longer available, but as far as I know, it was only available with pre-orders of the DVD from Phish Dry Goods (the only source I have to confirm this is a promotional e-mail I received). For these reasons, I'd suggest moving only those two sections from the CD article to the DVD article, and renaming (moving) Phish: Live in Brooklyn to Phish: Live in Brooklyn (CD) (also possibly giving the non-parenthetic title to the DVD article). If either article is given a parenthetic title, it should be the soundtrack, not the movie, as the DVD includes material not found on the CD, yet the CD's entire content is included on the DVD. Whatever happens, unless Phish: Live in Brooklyn becomes the umbrella article discussing both, Template:Phish requires an edit, as both the CD and DVD links point there; this is probably what misled TommyBoy76. Tobogganoggin 05:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DVDPhish1.jpg

Image:DVDPhish1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DVDPhish1.jpg

Image:DVDPhish1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)