Talk:Phong Nhị and Phong Nhất massacre
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 12, 2020 and February 12, 2022. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source for the US military investigation
editPlease review the article. Hankyurae makes numerous fallacies in terms of the primary sources.
http://vietnamvoices.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/US-Army-IG_ROK-Marines_Report_1969.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woo1693 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Phong Nhị and Phong Nhất massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110321214020/http://www.army.gov.au/AHU/docs/The_Australian_Army_and_the_Vietnam_War_Kil.pdf to http://www.army.gov.au/ahu/docs/The_Australian_Army_and_the_Vietnam_War_Kil.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306022318/http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0000023943 to http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0000023943
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Excess images
editBy this diff [1] on 27 June I removed 3 excess images, noting in my edit summary that there is already a link to the Commons page. User:184.22.22.123 reinstated the images in a gallery adding another image. I reverted this change saying that in my edit summary that they were excessive; follow WP:BRD and discuss on talk page why they should be included. The IP did not follow BRD but just reverted me saying "i get that there's a wikimedia article on this, but if the issue is excessive images, its easier to put it as a gallery" which is not in accordance with WP:BRD. Mztourist (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is nothing that is detracted from having the excess images as gallery images, and the wikimedia commons page is not only unorganized, but it isn't necessarily apparent. 184.22.22.123 (talk) 09:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- You are edit warring without engaging in a proper discussion here. Making a cursory comment while at the same time making a revert is not complying with WP:BRD. This is your last warning before I report you for edit-warring, you can self-revert your edit and discuss properly here or I will report you. Mztourist (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is nothing that is detracted from having the excess images as gallery images, and the wikimedia commons page is not only unorganized, but it isn't necessarily apparent. 184.22.22.123 (talk) 09:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Request the removal of lying documents
editThe National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Record Group (RG) 472 document already published an investigation report to the US Army at that time. At the time, there was no evidence that the Korean Marine Corps massacred. Requests to delete lying documents.
add [[2]]
https://www.rt.com/news/571142-vietnam-atrocity-court-korea/ 67.182.226.144 (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)