Talk:Physical (Olivia Newton-John song)


Video

edit

Were there two versions of the video? The one I've seen has her working out with overweight men, who only turn muscular when she gets in the shower (triggering a fantasy sequence?). The gay couples walking out is included, though. --Dhartung | Talk 07:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Physical.jpg

edit
 

Image:Physical.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sexuality

edit

I'm not sure to what extent this topic needs to be addressed in this article, but the existing mention seems flawed.

On the one hand, this website claims that Olivia Newton-John herself, being somewhat uncomfortable with the suggestive nature of the song's lyrics, wanted "a fun video about exercise rather than sex". There probably are books about her career which could serve as references on this point.

On the other, while I do agree that the video and album picture and so on served to give the song an additional identity, this was, and I think obviously, only a secondary measure to offset the suggestive nature of its lyrics.

The primary measure was the fact that Olivia Newton-John herself was a female rather than male performer. That meant that the song's theme - a lover's frustration at having to be slow and indirect, without the relationship proceeding to physical intimacy - was turned from a potentially threatening expression of male sexuality in its expected pattern to a role reversal. The video was simply a second line of defence.

Also, it isn't surprising (as the section of the article in question seems to imply) that the song still met opposition and censorship. Psychological measures to make listeners less uncomfortable with the song on an emotional level do not, in any way, prevent people from still perceiving what the lyrics say. A subtle influence on people's attitudes, as long as they aren't consciously fighting it, can be expected to modify behavior only slightly. Quadibloc (talk) 12:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Physical (Olivia Newton-John song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Category:Obscenity controversies in music"

edit

I don't know that anybody ever thought that the song contained any obscenities; it was much more of a suggestiveness controversy... AnonMoos (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Physical (Olivia Newton-John song)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Physical (Olivia Newton-John song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "RockontheNet":

  • From Physical (album): "Olivia Newton-John award and achievements". Rock on the Net. Retrieved 25 August 2012.
  • From Grammy Award for Best Female Pop Vocal Performance: "Grammy Awards: Best Pop Vocal Performance – Female". Rock on the Net. Retrieved 20 July 2011.

Reference named "peoplemagazine":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 23:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply