Talk:Pickled punks
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bibeyjj in topic Copyight Infringement
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-04. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Copyight Infringement
editNeeds to be re-written - this article is taken word-for-word from the website http://thehumanmarvels.com/?p=96. The author of the website does a lot of original and secondary research to find information on interesting human marvels, and it is not fair to him that his words are being stolen from his website and pasted here, without even a single reference to his website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.201.194 (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Earwig's Tool shows an almost complete similarity to the article you mentioned at [1]. Looking at the edit history, it appears that 130.111.249.215 added all of the content at 22:33, 17 December 2007 in this edit. As it has been so many years since this event occurred, it is hard to tell whether The Human Marvels or Wikipedia is the victim of copyright infringement. I think that the former is more likely, and that this content should be removed from Wikipedia. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 10:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)