This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
Not at all. I think the cost of making it could well have been £3000 in material costs. It's now £30,000 at most in the article, which I think is right because it was ensured for 30K and the cost of making it would have been lower. Also, there is already already a comparison of prices between 1966 and "now" in the article. I would think that 1) the replica would have been almost identical to the original and 2) that the price would be about right after conversion between those two dates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.95.237.162 (talk) 17:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It wasn't £6,000. It was £1,000. British Pathe has filmed evidence of the cheque being presented (this can be viewed on YouTube). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.82.121 (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why do people post incorrect or spurious facts, knowingly I might add, to enhance the interest level of the item. My "vandalism" is a legitimate protest and should not be censored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.50.14 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply