Talk:Pier (architecture)
Latest comment: 4 months ago by PhilKnight in topic Merge proposal
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was not merged. PhilKnight (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I propose merging Pier (bridge structure) into Pier (architecture). I think the content in Pier (bridge structure) can easily be explained in the context of Pier (architecture), and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Pier (architecture).PhilKnight (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose but there is far too much about bridges in the architecture one - the pics especially. That should be moved over. Really the bridge piers are sufficiently distinct to deserve their own article. Compound pier could well be moved into Pier (architecture) too. In this one, the distinction (or lack of one) between columns and pilasters and piers could also be better explained. Johnbod (talk) 11:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.