Talk:Pier Gerlofs Donia/GA1

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Not well-written: weak prose.

2. Factually accurate?: Not even close: no references, no footnotes, lots of original research.

3. Broad in coverage?: Doesn't look like it.

4. Neutral point of view?: No. Article uses an obviously biased tone.

5. Article stability? Yes.

6. Images?: OK.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. —Anas ^talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

—Anas ^talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)