Talk:Pier Paolo Vergerio

Pietro Paolo Vergerio

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 16:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

---

---

Pier Paolo Vergerio → Pietro Paolo Vergerio – Per VIAF it seems more common.[1]--Relisted Cúchullain ^t/c 17:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC) Eleassar ^{my talk} 22:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Question - Google Books gives 170,000 vs 27,000 for the Pier form. How does http://viaf.org/viaf/51698984/ indicate otherwise? Isn't that just the VIAF cataloguers' preference? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, this is completely possible. It seems to be the Italian version of the name. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 11:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Well actually both are the same name, Pier Paolo to Pietro Paolo as Jimmy is to James. But Pier Paolo is evidently more usual than the full form here. My question what exactly decides VIAF's listing? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose - the article as it stands is by far the common form. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.