| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editArticle about Dr. Piers Nash is currently under construction. Feel free to add material, but please do not delete the article.
Admins: Google Piers Nash and you'll see the article has a long way to go - and he clearly passes the notability test. Rklawton 14:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Wopumenita: Point of View questioned due to the actual author of this page being the one the biography is written about with no references to any of the information listed within.
A large number of references are noted. History indicates that content is not autobiographical. This is similar in appearance and content to may biographicals of living persons. No content appears to be in question. NPOV Neutrality marker removed. Suggest assignement quality scale GA?? Importance as mid or low?
Take a look on Google - everything checks out. No obvious reason for NPOV. As acceptable as other mid imp bios. Good publications, prestigious college etc. No awards at the Nobel level - certainly not high importance. I added a few more refs.