Talk:Pindus National Park/GA1
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 16:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comments
- Values need conversion to imperial units. This is easy to do using {{convert}}.
Done
- Avoid terms like "recently created" (even with the year right behind it). Instead say something like "Since 2003, ...". Also, what is the name of this authority?
- Done
- What is Natura 2000? This needs more explaining.
- I've added a brief discription about Natura 2000
- "Centaurea vlachorum" should be in italics, similarly "Buxus sempervirens" and "Abies borisii-regis".
- Done
- "opening up many forest roads towards all directions" sounds weired. I don't think "towards" is the right word here.
- Hope it's ok now
- Africa is overlinked
- Done
- It is a bit POV to link to the disadvantages of the hydroelectricity page. Also, articles should not have advantages and disadvantages sections, so this subsection may very well be gone one day. Similar with grazing.
- I've removed the subsections on both links.
- Why isn't Pindus Mountains mixed forests mentioned in the article itself? Or does it only have the name in common?
- I've added a link inside the article's main body, since PMMF is a much more wider region that includes the Pindus National Park.
- Depending on the management practices, is there much tourism or hiking in the area? What sort of restrictions apply? This would be nice to have something about in the management section.
- I've added an additional paragraph in management section.
Well written and interesting article which is very close to the good article standard. However, it seems a bit short, particularly the geography. Are there other, perhaps more general, sources about either the geography or nature that can lengthen the article a bit? I am not expecting the article to be as extensive as for instance Banff National Park, but it is shorter than the nearly vegetation-free, extremely remove Indre Wijdefjorden National Park I am working on right now will be when I save it. Placing on hold until questions are answered and details are fixed. Arsenikk (talk) 16:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I've managed to add some kbs of info in the article in all the sections.Alexikoua (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations with a good article. I had to remove the fair use image with the coin. Fair use can only be used in an article discussing the coin itself, not an article discussing the topic of the coin. Arsenikk (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC)