This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
All six song articles are short, and are unlikely to be expanded any further - the information just doesn't exist to do so. A lot of what they do have is duplicated on the album article. After all, most songs do not merit individual articles, per WP:SONGS. Additionally, the album article has little content, and would be improved by the addition of what's on the song articles. Instead of stringing out the little information we have into several articles, let's work to make one quality article on the Pink Tape album. :) Shinyang-i (talk) 19:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
This source describes the album's styles as art pop: "2013’s Pink Tape solidified their place as queens of art-pop." Personally I advocate this viewpoint, but I need to hear what makes Cosmicgirls oppose this. Simon (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the source is referring to the album's style/genre. Cosmicgirls' assertion that this is referring to the art film is not supported by the text. From the context, the author is obviously talking about the music: The multi-ethnic five-member group has consistently put out the most experimental and just plain odd mainstream K-pop music, and it’s all pretty great. 2013’s Pink Tape solidified their place as queens of art-pop... The whole review is talking about music. Random86 (talk) 19:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Random86: Perhaps we should invite somebody to join the discussion. With the only us three, I'm afraid we could not come to the final conclusion. Simon (talk) 03:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
