Talk:Pinocytosis

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Marchino61 in topic 3 forms of endocytosis?

3 forms of endocytosis?

edit

The article on endocytosis only lists 2 processes, pinocytosis and phagocytosis. What is the third form? Whatever it is, add it to the endocytosis article please. If not, please change it to only 2 forms until input is received. Tyciol 07:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The third type is receptopr-mediated endocytosis (clathrin-mediated or claveolin-mediated). The article seems confused. IT one place it recognises that these are different. In another, it says they are forms of pinocytosis. I have attempted to clarify this. The article is also sorely lacking in references.
Marchino61 (talk) 06:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

the third type is pinocytosis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.188.230.200 (talk) 07:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Non-specific, adsorptive pinocytosis

edit

Definition of pinocytosis seems to encompass the content at Non-specific, adsorptive pinocytosis. Should we merge that article into this one? Ringbang (talk) 22:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)   DoneReply

Cell drinking

edit

Apparently, another word for this is “cell drinking”: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Cup o’ Java (talkedits) 04:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Why does "pinocyte" redirect here?

edit

Word not used in article. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 01:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Endocytosis

edit

Endocytosis is the transport of material in to the cell across the plasma membrane.They are two types of endocytosis phagosytosisand pinocytosis

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pinocytosis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Rated "high" as high school/SAT biology content. - tameeria 00:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 00:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

No violation

edit

The link submitted only has free abstract. It’s open part issued by publisher . The closed part (copyrighted) is neither seen nor taken.

Please revert as no violation Wikiblogmaster (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

The reference of free abstract of article is only cited in article. The free abstract is openly available by publishers and this is science. The matter written is science and theory thereof open to public.

No violation, please revert . Wikiblogmaster (talk) 21:42, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply