Talk:Pinus aristata

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Name

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Rocky Mountains Bristlecone Pine is correct, as it is named from its occurrence in the Rocky Mountains (a plural entity), not the "Rocky Mountain" - MPF 09:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I only see references to the singular, when talking about the tree.. --Kvuo 08:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edited for categories

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just edited the way this shows up in the category "Pinus." It had been set up to alphabetize there under the common name, "Rocky Mountains Bristlecone Pine." But this didn't make sense since it showed on the list with the binomial (scientific) name. So I changed it to realphabetize it that way. But I added the Redirect page to the Category. So now, the common name does show. 140.147.236.194 (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Stephen KoscieszaReply

Add topic