This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi all, i would be inclined to keep this article, pending the inclusion of references. The person in question seems to have a reasonable catalogue of published work and has won an award (although i am unfamiliar with the award in question). I am not arguing that this is a cast-iron keep, but, on balance, with references and modification to how the article is written, i think that this could be kept. Best, Darigan (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
As it is the article appears to fail WP:ACADEMIC, but it's possible more material is available on the subject to show notability, so I won't even prod it just yet. I also just spotted that it's an WP:Autobiography, though that on its own isn't a reason for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've just left a welcome on the page of the creator of this article, i have also invited the creator to offer some citations even though there may be a conflict of interest. Best, Darigan (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply