Talk:Pioneer SX-1980
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Specs
editThough some info in the article may seem dubious, the era as well as the third party reviews that go into specifics are much better than most any modern product. The headroom given matches the distortion at rated figures, as well as the third party confirmed actual peak power. It all works out fairly well. Most individual products are absolutely in any way not notable, but this is an exception as far as I would have opposed the PROD if I had seen it, so feel free to AfD. B137 (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Also I recreated after running into How can 30-year-old receivers sound better than new ones? a CNET source by chance. B137 (talk) 02:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Puff piece for sellers on the used market?
editI recently found a listing on Ebay for this (undoubtedly fine) product suggesting this was the 'Holy Grail' of audio receivers and using other hyperbolic language found in this article to justify a price of nearly $20,000.
Words like 'staggering' are not encyclopaedic and should not be used to inflate prices on the used market. 2601:441:8300:E1BC:7D93:90A3:86EC:76CD (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- What will be funny is the clown that will put out that kind of money just for the 'street cred' for an old receiver. However, the original MSRP should be in the article. 2603:6080:21F0:8E40:AC59:B4AC:5AD3:535D (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)