Talk:Piracy Funds Terrorism/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The sections of this article aren't put together too well and are stubby. For example, the "Music" and "Artwork" sections can be subsections, "Recording" can be made a subsection and can under a "Background" section; "Release" and "Critical reception" can also be merged. As it stands, the sections aren't chronologically correct. Sections aside, M.I.A.'s and Diplo's full names don't have to be included in the article. Under "Release", the last sentence reads "…before selling out completely." The word "completely" seems redundant.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Mia-piracyfunds-.jpg does not comply with fair use; the album cover should be no larger than 300 px on one side (see here for further details).

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am placing the article on hold for seven days to allow for the above concerns to be addressed. DiverseMentality 22:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I have re-sized the image, and another editor appears to have taken care of your other points, let me/us know if it's now OK.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

All concerns have been addressed, I'm passing the article. Good work! DiverseMentality 02:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)