Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction) at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Tokyo Disneyland version
editThis article could really do with a picture of the Tokyo Disneyland attraction. 65.130.130.94 (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Analysis
editThere are a particularly fascinating series of analyses on the ride's structure and use of narrative, taking cues from prominant trends in film and media theory of the 1960s. As far as I know, none of these theories have been published in academic journals, but could we find a way to incorporate them? This is one of my favorites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonboots (talk • contribs) 18:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- The citation you provide is a self-published blog, and thus is not considered notable. Reliable sources need not be of a scholarly nature to be considered reliable; newspapers, magazines and the like are quite acceptable. Blogs and fan-sites, however, are not. --McDoobAU93 18:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002040455/http://www.mouseshoppe.com/Merchant5/productzoom/32500.jpg to http://www.mouseshoppe.com/Merchant5/productzoom/32500.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Log flume
editOne or more anonymous users have been inserting the claim that this ride is a log flume. Is there any support or consensus for such a claim? If not, I’d consider adding a hidden comment where it’s usually inserted, since the user appears noncommunicative. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Pirates does not fit the definition of a log flume according to the description of a flume in the "Ride Design" section of the wiki page, Log flume (ride). I believe it is just one persistent — and annoying — user who insists on making this change. I support the addition of a hidden comment although I doubt it will stop this user from vandalizing the page.—JlACEer (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- It’s only vandalism if it’s
deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose
, which the user’s edits elsewhere do not seem to be. More likely a lack of competence and of understanding what words mean, I would think. If the hidden text doesn’t help, would you say an indef semi-protect request would be reasonable? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)- It's vandalism when the person has been repeatedly told that they are incorrect and warned. Deliberately introducing incorrect information is vandalism. oknazevad (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- It’s only vandalism if it’s
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Goats
editList something about the two goats that appear on the ride. 174.24.104.56 (talk) 01:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)