Talk:Piroctone olamine

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Piroctone structure

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The structure drawn for piroctone is incorrect. Based upon the SMILES string given, the structure should have a single bond drawn between the carbonyl carbon and the nitrogen atom. TEWood (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have replaced the image with an accurate one from the corresponding German article. ChemNerd (talk) 18:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

hair loss

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Apparently it is as effective as Ketoconazole in slowing down hair loss...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18498517

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5350740_Nudging_hair_shedding_by_antidandruff_shampoos_A_comparison_of_1_ketoconazole_1_piroctone_olamine_and_1_zinc_pyrithione_formulations

--78.54.52.101 (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

primary source, not useful. Please see WP:MEDRS. Jytdog (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why? --77.186.190.202 (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Did you read MEDRS? If you did, what did you not understand? Jytdog (talk) 00:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic