Talk:Pixelmetrix
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rich Farmbrough in topic Advertising template
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (February 2011) |
Advertising template
editNot sure why Wikipedia find this advertising. Looks neutral and objective to me. All facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suksme (talk • contribs) — Suksme (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Facts can be embellished, or set forth in a way to make them seem more attractive or appealing, and the problem does afflict this article to a certain degree. Remember that the article is not here to tell the Fascinating Story of Pixelmetrix but instead to describe what the company is, what it does, how big it is, and maybe where it is and who runs it. That can be accomplished in really very few words in a lot of cases. I've tried to pare down some of the story-telling tone, and probably a bit more could come out still. JohnInDC (talk) 14:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Tone now seems OK to me from the POV perspective, but by all means tweak the early recruitment, which doesn't really hang together that well. Oh .. I'll go and tweak a little. Rich Farmbrough, 23:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC).
- Looks relevant, basically this was a four person startup. Rich Farmbrough, 23:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC).
- Looks relevant, basically this was a four person startup. Rich Farmbrough, 23:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC).
- Tone now seems OK to me from the POV perspective, but by all means tweak the early recruitment, which doesn't really hang together that well. Oh .. I'll go and tweak a little. Rich Farmbrough, 23:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC).