This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I removed the PROD after reading the Forbes article, and several articles in Russian. There are several that talk about the renaming of the game, it's new revenue model and such, but these are legitimate topics for a company article, and much of the talk isn't just about the game, but about the innovation of the company itself, justifying more than just an article on the game. While it isn't the strongest case of notability, I think it passes GNG cleanly and would survive an AFD. Being a Russian company, it isn't surprising most of the sources are in Russian, which of course has no effect on whether or not they pass WP:RS. Farmer Brown (talk) 12:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
