Talk:Plack (software)
![]() | The contents of the PSGI page were merged into Plack (software). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plack (software) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROD and PSGI merge
editGiven search reveals multiple books referencing both PSGI and Plack and failure to identify the quality of the PROD procedure is questionable. I am unsure if the former PROD has disrupted into a merge marriage of convenience or is a genuine good fit (I simply don't know), and perhaps also if procedure has been fully technically followed. Unfortunately I have other things to do but cannot fail to object to the PROD on this article as a minimum given the books; and may revisit later.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- While it was prompted by a prod, I think merging PSGI is a good fit. Plack is the first exemplar application framework implementing PSGI and they are often discussed together in the literature. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
11:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Disurption
editThis Plack/PSGI seem to be the focus of disruption from muliple IP addresses at the moment which is taking a disruptive amount of effort to resolve It seems there is a negative COI.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are also disrupting Wikipedia by adding content not backed by independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.174.3.214 (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Lack of independent sources
edit6 years has passed waiting for independent sources to be provided. I will remove content not backed by independent sources as Wikipedia requires. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.174.3.214 (talk) 14:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia policies do not require uncontroversial content to be backed by independent sources. And given that PGSI was PROD'd by an anon IP when a merge and book references were present, and this article PROD'd following that merge again when references exists I feel that there is an attempt to remove content. Please concentrate on improving the article with a positive attitude by adding references and content. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- I do want to note this IP address seems to be making a similar comment from a recently IP address that was blocked previously seen here. As they have a dynamic IP address, their contributions can be monitored here. – The Grid (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)