Talk:Plan (drawing)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Wiki.Tango.Foxtrot in topic Merge working drawing here
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plan (drawing) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Move?
edit- Move this page to Plan (drawing) or Plan (diagram), and redirect Plans to Plan? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, that sounds good. Gary King (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support move to Plan (<something>) per MOS:NAME#Prefer singular nouns --Rogerb67 (talk) 01:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Likewise with drawings and drawing? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Merge working drawing here
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- This discussion has grown stale and the article in question is still a stub after three years. It has been merged into plan (drawing). WTF? (talk) 04:41, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Both this article and the working drawing article seem to have almost the same subject, so I propose to merge the working drawing article here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- There is some discussion about this merge on Talk:Technical drawing#The focussed of the set of working drawing articles. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
A Plan is more than a drawing. It's a document, like "Infrastructure Plan", especially in engineering. It must match with specifications and norms. Although it includes a drawing, it has to meet specific requirements and have a road map to build something. It also needs to have an approval by a professional and authority. A drawing may not obey any rules being more flexible and could be considered art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aneko (talk • contribs) 18:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.