Talk:Plant defense against herbivory/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 17:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

• References 42, 69, 11, 43 are dead/inactive. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 18:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

 Fixed--DO11.10 (talk) 18:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • Well written, if over-technical in some places.

   b (MoS):

   • Generally conforms to manual of style. However there is some overlinking going on. Links within the article should be reassessed in accordance with GA:WIAGA and WP:OVERLINK. A term should generally only be linked the first time it appears in an article. I have removed some instances of overlinking, but an editor with a better acquaintance with the article's subject matter would be better able to determine a links importance.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Well referenced. However, there are a number of dead links. As these were primarily supporting sources, it has not been deemed necessary to fail or hold the article. However, these problems should be fixed asap.

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • Citations are to third party publications.

   c (OR):

   • No evidence of OR.

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   • Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.

   b (focused):

   • Remains focused. No digressions.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   • No issues concerning POV evident.

5. It is stable:

   • No edit wars etc.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • Images are properly tagged and justified.

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • Images are accompanied by contextual captions.

7. Overall:

   Keep/Delist: KEEP ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 18:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)