 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Transwiki?
edit- This page has many incoming links. Some sort of page is needed here in Wikipedia. If you copy it to Wiktionary, please also leave it here. This sort of thing happened with page Vial. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't agree with this transwiki. Right now this is just a disambig page, which I'm cool with. Why don't we just retag it as a disambig and be done with it? Wizard191 (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't have an opinion on adding this to Wikionary but I do believe that the article needs to continue to exist in Wikipedia. Some of the more general information relevant to a limited description of what a plasma torch is should be copied from the articles that are linked from this page and a short article should be created here.Kinemaτ 19:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I added a lot more information to this page. Rudolfensis (talk) 21:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
External image
editThe externally hosted image is of marginal quality, is not freely licensed, and gives little useful context. I'm curious about the reasons for including a link to it when there are a number of much better images on Commons. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed the image, since there were no objections. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Why didn't you replace it with one of these "better images"? Perhaps you can suggest one. The image was from a scientific journal. Rudolfensis (talk) 21:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- You've written almost the whole article. You should pick the image. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- I already did, but you deleted it ;) Your move ;D Rudolfensis (talk) 16:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- You've written almost the whole article. You should pick the image. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Why didn't you replace it with one of these "better images"? Perhaps you can suggest one. The image was from a scientific journal. Rudolfensis (talk) 21:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)