This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I would question how objective the inclusion of a single review, which is explicitly mentioned to have been hand picked for promotional material for the book, is. As an alternative, I would think a summary of critical approval, including relevant citations would be more balanced (note that I have no opinion as to the accuracy of the reviews as they pertain to the book). Thomas Wright (talk) 10:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply