Talk:Plastic Love

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Ippantekina in topic GA Review


Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk21:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Reviewed: exempt (?)

Created by Ganbaruby (talk). Self-nominated at 02:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

 Article is new enough and long enough. Source #10 doesn't seem to support the first sentence cited to it. "notability through the platform's recommendations feature" aside from being ungrammatical isn't supported by #9 either. #8 does not appear to support "rise of the vaporwave" either. Most of #4 does not support the statements cited to it. I can't read the Japanese sources. No copyvio or plagiarism that I could notice. It's not clear in the hook if 2017 should be 2018. I see that you are QPQ exempt. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks for the review. I did a bit of editing, and I just want to run some edits with you again. The citation numbers changed, so I'll try to refer to them by website name.
  • I've removed the first sentence to the Vice (#10) article because it doesn't really support it directly, as you said. I dug through some Japanese sites as well, and most pointed to the YouTube comment section as proof of "resonance with international viewers". I don't really feel like that's notable enough to include, so I've left it out for now.
  • The Open Culture article (#9) does point to YouTube's algorithms, but I've also added the Japan Times one (#3) because it also says so as well. I've also reworded the sentence for better flow.
  • Again, the Rolling Stone article (#8) does point to Plastic Love coinciding with vaporwave, but I've added a new source to support that.
  • I've removed the phrase about promoting the 30th anneversary of Variety, which I realized the Arama article (#4) doesn't actually say so. The rest of the information is there.
Let me know if there's any more that I should change. Thanks!   Ganbaruby!  (talk to me) 07:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Ganbaruby: One last question: Are we sure it was a resurgence? The hook depends on it but I am not sure if the sources support this contention. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Yes I would call it a "resurgence", since Takeuchi at the time was already a well known singer, and the album that Plastic Love comes from, Variety, did top Oricon's weekly album charts at its release. I would also be fine with "surge in popularity" instead.   Ganbaruby!  (talk to me) 09:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
On a side note, do you think the picture in the article is a good addition, or not really?   Ganbaruby!  (talk to me) 09:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I am a little wary of the copyright licence of that image. When one uploads fanart, it often happens that people crib images off the Internet w/o giving a source and with the image being non-free. The problem I see with "resurgence" is that it's not used in the sources; perhaps a quote could clarify this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Taken from the Japan Times article: "'Variety' was a hit, outselling her previous release and debuting at the top of the domestic charts... Takeuchi’s success, however, has long been limited to her home country. That changed in 2017 when the internet discovered her 1984 track, “Plastic Love.” I think that adequately backs my word choice there.   Ganbaruby!  (talk to me) 09:54, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

New Music Video

edit

Apparently there's a new music video made for this song, 35 years after the song's original release.

https://www.scoutmag.ph/music/city-pop-plastic-love-roginl-20190517 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulrefrain (talkcontribs) 06:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Sweetest Music" cover art

edit

I thought about inserting the "Sweetest Music" cover art for the "Resurgence" section especially to help readers identify what is discussed, even when identical to the 2021 reissue. --George Ho (talk) 06:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Plastic Love/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 07:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


Happy to take up this review. In the meantime, I'd appreciate it if you could take up one of my Music GANs which might stall into the next few months... Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 07:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lead and infobox

edit

Background and recording

edit

Composition

edit

Reception

edit

Cultural impact

edit

More to come.. Ippantekina (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cultural impact (cont'd)

edit