Talk:Platonic epistemology

Untitled

appears to be total nonsense, or at any rate off topic. m.e. 12:46, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Please tell me you're being ironic. Uriah923 05:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Removing stub

I added quite a bit of content to the site and think it's worthy of removing the sub designation now. Uriah923 05:21, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

I think this should be enough to remove the stub status. I think the next step should be quoting/citing specific references to the Meno and other dialouges. I can put that on my to do list, but I won't get to it for a while. I wouldn't object to someone else doing it.Dayleyj 20:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

plato's doctrine of recollection

as I recall, and i'm no expert, plato's epistemology more or less just is his doctrine of recollection, so I don't see why the articles shouldn't be merged Killtacular 03:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I think that it could be kept. Maybe it could be renamed or at least redirected from/to "Plato's Doctrine of Recollection."Dayleyj 20:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Read the Timaeus.--MWAK (talk) 07:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Source

While I am neither an expert nor terribly familiar with the works of Plato overall, the information presented in the article seems quite sound and well phrased. For confirmation, though, I recommend someone look to Plato's complete works as presented at classics.MIT.edu 99.65.212.249 (talk) 07:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC) J Lau

A good source

A book reviewing Platonic epistemology: Vogt, Katja Maria (September 2012). Belief and truth : a skeptic reading of Plato. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199916818. --Signimu (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)