Talk:Playalitical

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Skeletor3000 in topic Cleanup, peacock template removed

Cleanup message

edit

Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.

Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 12:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BizzyBonemidwestcowboy.jpg

edit
 

Image:BizzyBonemidwestcowboy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:The Midwest Cowboy.jpg

edit
 

Image:The Midwest Cowboy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup, peacock template removed

edit

This article had some substantial POV problems. Namely, it was full of weasel words and promotional tone. I've cleaned that up and removed the peacock template. Please discuss here if you think the template should be reinstated and I'll try to fix the article more. I also moved info about his debut album from the lead to the Career section. There was also a lot of conflicting info about what his first album actually was. My interpretation was based off the suggestion that recordings previous to his "debut" album were informal mix tapes and the like, and therefore not really worth discussing. If this is incorrect, please discuss here or make corrections yourself, but please check to make sure the article actually makes sense instead of claiming two different things like it did before. I also removed two Amazon shopping links. I replaced one by citing the same album on Discogs. The other appears to be a digital mixtape only, and only appears as a download on online music shops. I'm of the opinion that this type of release isn't worth including in an article, but I left it anyway, sans shopping link.

Thanks! Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply