This article was nominated for deletion on 22 December 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
editHmmm, looks a bit like an advert to me. --Nathan 07:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Woah, big improvement since this morning. Just the fact that its longer makes it look like less of an advert, and more like an encyclopedia entry. It still shows that the author (Irobeth) has a bias (do you run the site, by any chance?), but its less of a mark-for-deletion and more of an room-for-improvement case. Well done. --Nathan 20:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Deletion
editI object to the deletion of this article. Darrik2 20:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)