Talk:Podocarpus totara

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Move to Scientific name reverted as it was against Wikipedia policy of using common names where possible. See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Use_common_names_of_persons_and_things

It's part of a project discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life#Scientific name page titles. It makes the indexing at Category:Podocarpaceae work in that it groups all species in the genus together. Over 90% of the species in Podocarpaceae don't have any common name at all; to have a small handful indexed separately by common name is unhelpful. - MPF 11:15, 28 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

On the other hand WikiProject_Tree_of_Life#Article_titles_and_common_names says to use the common name if unique. Alan Liefting 09:06, 27 August 2005 (UTC)Reply


This article states that Totara wood is hard, whereas personal experience suggests it is one of the softest NZ woods... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.60.137.120 (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Podocarpus totara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply