Talk:Pokéfuta
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Canadianerk in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Pokéfuta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Canadianerk (talk) 11:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that there are over 200 manhole covers featuring Pokémon in Japan? Source: Famitsu, CTRL+F "221"
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Károly Kaszala
- Comment: Unfortunately DYK does not allow Fair Use images, otherwise we would have an Eevee on Wikipedia's Main Page
Created by Juxlos (talk). Self-nominated at 13:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC).
- @Juxlos: Did you check flickr? Seems that these images are ok to use. Artem.G (talk) 14:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Artem.G: I'm not confident enough that 2D art falls under freedom of panorama in Japan - if they are, then the photograph on the article (already posted under CC-BY-SA 3.0 in jaWiki) is also free use, and we might as well use that. Juxlos (talk) 15:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- And yeah reading the text of the law it seems that at best we can argue for a non-commercial license - still not free use as DYK pictures have to be usable for commercial purposes. Juxlos (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- You're probably right, I didn't know that 2d art is not compatible with freedom of panorama :( Artem.G (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Article is new (Dec 1), no copyvio detected, sources are ok, the only image is fair use. The hook is interesting, qpq done. So it's good to go . Artem.G (talk) 15:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)