Talk:Pokémate/Archive 1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ost316 in topic References
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Pokémate. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Requested article
This article had been requested by Wiki Project Anime and manga here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Japan/Anime_and_Manga#P
Pokemate redirected to PokéMate??? Help needed???
If anyone knows how to create redirects, the redirect from Pokemate to PokéMate would be vital to this article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurowoofwoof111 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
References
At the present, this article relies on Serebii.net, which is not considered a WP:RS. Below are some links that may be useful to replace some Serebii links or expand the article:
- http://k-tai.impress.co.jp/cda/article/news_toppage/28884.html
- http://www.famitsu.com/k_tai/news/2006/06/05/607,1149476771,54366,0,0.html
- http://game.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/20060424/poke.htm
- http://www.square-enix.co.jp/mobile/communication/pokemate/
—Ost (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- As long as the information is true, its better to use no sources then fansites. Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree, especially since this is a stub nowhere near a featured article. You're arguing that WP:RS is more important than WP:V, while I feel that information added should be attributed to its source. I welcome removal of the Serebii links if you could find a source to replace their information, but I cannot find any RS that confirm the information. Therefore, I do not know that the information is true and I think that it would be better to let readers know where the information is from, rather than tagging with {{fact}}. As I said in the edit notice, the information taken from Serebii should be removed if the Serebii links are removed; if the links are not valid, the information should not be valid either and since the information was added with the links, there would be no attribution to the original authors if the references are removed. —Ost (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)