Talk:Poleta Formation

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 22 June 2017

Remarks about age Poleta formation and its biozonation

edit

The Poleta formation is contains fragments of two Laurentian biozones: the upper part of the Nevadella Zone, and also the smaller lower part of Bonnia-Olenellus Zone (= Olenellus Zone). The Nevadella Zone is correlated with the Atdabanian and lowermost Botomian, the Bonnia-Olenellus Zone is correlated with the Botomian and Toyonian Stages. The beds of Poleta formation with its helicoplacoids are in limit of the Nevadella Zone and aged upper Atdabanian. Greenland Sirius Passet lagerstatte is correlated to Laurentian Nevadella Zone.
Or now it is considered that all Poleta formation is Olenellus Zone, Dyeran? Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 12:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC))Reply

The base of the Poleta Fm. date to the Olenellus Zone and aged Dyeran Stage. It is the private point of view of Adam M. English and Loren E. Babcock or it is fact which is recognized by the majority of researchers? What happened? The volume of the Olenellus Zone and Dyeran has been increased or correlation of the Poleta Formation has been reconsidered? As far as I know it is the first publication of such point of view, therefore this idea is not tested by the scientific community and possible can be not considered as reliable and priority.

In all publications of other authors is used this scheme: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.08.008
See also new detailed biozonation of the Montezuman Stage in the Esmeralda Basin of western Nevada. Stewart Hollingsworth includes lower Poleta Formation and its index trilobites into Montezuman Stage. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2008CD/finalprogram/abstract_134944.htm Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC))Reply

On re-inspection, the authors state:
It is quite possible that I have misrepresented this in the WP article. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 16:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for explanation. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2010 (UTC))Reply

Requested move 22 June 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOved. No objections, and seems reasonable as others are all named this way  — Amakuru (talk) 12:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply



Poleta formationPoleta Formation – Consistent naming with Formation in capital. Tisquesusa (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.