This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Latest comment: 26 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article is low quality, many terms are repeated multiple times, the layout is inconsistent with a random table being added in the middle, etc. I added a {{copyedit}} tag but honestly I'm not sure if this shouldn't just be nominated for deletion.
See WP:NOTDICTIONARY and WP:GNG as basically the only sources listed are dictionaries, so I'm not sure this is notable enough to be an article, as these words have their own Wiktionary pages, so them having their own article on Wikipedia seems pointless.
--Wojtekpolska1013 (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
